Revised policy question:
“What actions, if any, should be taken by Ministry of Commerce of China to prevent over-development of E-commerce to respond to concerns that an “E-economic bubble” may develop in China?
Client:
The policymakers in Ministry of Commerce of China.
Background:
In the recent year, more and more major IT companies start to invest huge amount of money to develop the E-commerce, even some investors from different field also invest the E-commerce directly. They believe that E-commerce will become more and more popular. The E-commerce has lots of market potential. [1] However, uncontrolled development, unhealthy competition, and blind investment have occurred, all these may cause the market disorder. [2] Therefore, the new policies need to be made, in order to prevent the over-development of E-commerce to respond to concerns that an “E-economic bubble” may develop in China. [3]
Options:
1. Status quo: This option will make the policymakers keep the current situation, nothing will be changed. The over-development will continue; companies will keep unhealthy competitions.
This option may let the over-development keep going, which may form the "E-commerce bubble".
Advantages:
1). No financial investment: for this option, almost no money cost. The policy system has been already built.
2). Simple regulatory procedures: To found a company to develop E commerce, there is no deeply background check needed. Only simple application and enough required starting fund.
Disadvantages:
1).Taking the weak control for E-commerce development.
2). Cannot prevent over-development of E-commerce.
2. Adding Regulatory framework:
To develop E commerce, a lot of paper work needs to be done, including detailed application, strict review, increasing the amount of starting fund. And deeply background check will be processed. The major company who want to develop the E-commerce must be issued a permit by the government. This will make sure the commercial situation is safe. Every year, the company needs to submit summary report of previous year to government to recheck. Control the risk of "bubble".
Advantages:
1.) Small amount financial investment: the money only cost for processing paper work and background check. Some part cost will be taken care by the companies.
2). The safety and credit background is guaranteed. The order of the market becomes more formal.
Disadvantages:
1). The policies of the standard may need some time and research date to develop.
2). Complex regulatory procedures: Need professional legal group to finish.
3. Economic policy: Building official platform to help SMEs or private sellers to develop their own small size "E-commerce". It will be more personalized and have more interaction with customers; the government also can give them the development direction, reducing over and blind development. And, the government needs to break the monopoly from major companies. Also, the economic policy may give the special policy or promotion to encourage companies who develop the SMEs E-commerce software development.
Advantages:
1). No Complex regulatory procedures: Only some paper works and enough required starting fund.
2.) The policy will provide a positive development situation for the whole market.
Disadvantages:
1). Large amount financial investment: the money cost for building platform, promote SMEs and private sellers development, encourage software R&D.
2). Slowly process, may take some time to make everything reach the balance.
In general:
Options
|
Efficiency
|
Effectiveness
|
Equity
|
Ease of political acceptability
|
Status quo
|
十
|
一
|
?
|
〇
|
Adding Regulatory framework
|
十
|
十
|
一
|
一
|
Economic policy
|
〇
|
十
|
十
|
十
|
Reference:
[1]. http://news.xinhuanet.com/tech/2014-09/12/c_126978488.htm
[2]. http://tech.qq.com/a/20130620/003502.htm
[3]. http://www.chinaacc.com/new/207_437_201106/14ba2020261320.shtml
Since your idea relates to e-commerce, which is related to technology, there is a need for e-monitoring the policy. Please also analyze your policy options from the perspective of availability of e-monitoring leveraging the technology available in the market.
ReplyDeleteIn your option2, if E-commerce company must be issued a permit by government, will this policy have negative influence to the e-commerce industry?
ReplyDeleteYou could be more specific about your policy options, for example. what kind of platform is provided in your third option. Also, include who should implement each policy in your options.
ReplyDeleteIn the third option, what kind of direction can the policy provide? And how can it have more interaction with customers ?
ReplyDeleteAs far as I know, e-commerce works everywhere without many regulations. So why do you think it should be regulated? Are there other countries that have regulated e-commerce because of risk of e-economic bubble?
ReplyDeleteChinese e-commerce companies are very active not only on national scale, but also internationally. Are you going to consider the international business of these companies? On the international scale, can they develop such a "bubble"? Or the domestic policy will contribute to the resolution of this problem as well?
ReplyDeleteFor option 3, please further describe economic policies. Would it extend to all SMEs, or only those deemed most viable by ministry officials? How efficient would the first option be, and how equitable would the last option be? Or would there be standard benchmarks to allow inclusion?
ReplyDeleteI like the choice of topic, as well as how you have approached this problem. I would suggest that the question could be reworded slightly - right now it seems like the 'e-economic bubble' is the problem that you're trying to address, but some of the measures seem to be contributing to this bubble.
ReplyDeleteIn the option 2, could you discuss the complex regulartory procedures in detail?
ReplyDelete